Patent Research & IP Intelligence · Since 2016

The Research. The Analysis. The Sign-off.

In matters of intellectual property, the difference between a thorough search and a defensible conclusion is not technology — it is judgment. 3AIP brings rigorous methodology applied by experts who understand what the findings mean, not just how to find them.

Abstract technical grid in deep blue
Research coverage
6+ jurisdictions.
One accountable team.
Trusted by IP teams & counsel at
SkaddenDLA PiperDinsmoreDuane MorrisFoley & LardnerKing & SpaldingYoung ConawaySterne KesslerMercedes-Benz GroupPrimetalsAndritzInfineonLISTNeodentSQCFB RiceSMICSIM IPOrrickMaynard NexsenGMR GroupDorseyBaker BottsTilleke & Gibbins
10+
Years in practice
Chandigarh Tricity, India
5,000+
Projects completed
1,000+ FTO & invalidity searches
300+
Clients served
law firms & in-house teams
50+
Countries covered
100+ technology domains
100%
Named analyst accountability
on every deliverable
A decade of patent research·Named-analyst accountability on every matter·Patent, NPL, standards, product and prosecution sources.
02The layer of judgment

The layer of judgment between data and decision.

Patent data is plentiful; retrieval tools have made it more so. What remains scarce is the layer in between — reading evidence against the specific question, deciding what is genuinely relevant, and building a record the decision can rest on.

01

Methodological Rigor

Every project begins with a definitive research plan: the question we answer, the sources we exhaust, and the standard the conclusion must meet.

02

Litigation-Grade Documentation

Reports built for use, not for filing: every conclusion documented, every source traceable, every finding standing behind a named analyst.

03

Expert Interpretation

Our analysts deliver judgment, not raw findings: what was found, what it means for your question, and what to do about it.

04

Global Reach, Named Accountability

Coverage across major patent jurisdictions, with research plans aligned to the relevant offices, family records and technical sources. Every project is handled by a named analyst and reviewer.

03Human-led. AI-supported.
How we use AI — and where we don’t.

The search is human. The busywork is not.

Every search begins and ends with a person. Our analyst reads your invention, builds the search strategy — concepts, classification codes, terminology and technical equivalents — and runs it across patent databases and non-patent literature, refining the queries as the art comes in.

AI sits at the edges of that work, not at its center. We use it for routine tasks that slow analysts down without changing the conclusion — removing duplicates, grouping patent families, translating foreign-language documents and formatting reports — so more of the analyst’s time goes into reading and judging the art.

Your confidential material is never entered into any third-party AI tool.

Which references matter, why they matter and what they mean for your claims are decisions made and signed by a named analyst. The tools save time; the search, the judgment and the confidentiality stay with people.

Hands developing a research strategy across documents and laptops
05How we work

A pipeline built to make the research defensible.

Finding the art is only the beginning. Human review, documented reasoning and named sign-off turn findings into a record counsel can use.

01

Human-Built Strategy, Analyst-Run Search

A named analyst reads the invention and builds the search strategy: concepts, CPC/IPC classifications, keywords and technical equivalents. The analyst then runs and refines the search across patent databases and non-patent literature. AI tools help with routine tasks such as de-duplication, family grouping and translation; they do not decide what is searched or what is relevant. The client’s confidential disclosure is never submitted to any third-party AI tool.

02

Human Expert Review

A named analyst assesses every retrieved reference against the question the research must answer. Where the engagement is claim-focused — such as FTO, evidence-of-use or infringement analysis — the analyst maps the relevant claim elements against the technology or evidence under review. Hallucinated, unsupported or misapplied citations are flagged in every service.

03

Documented Reasoning Trail

Full audit trail: search queries run, databases accessed, relevance rationale for every included and excluded reference. Reproducible and defensible.

04

Named Sign-off

A credentialed analyst and senior reviewer co-sign every deliverable. The opinion is ours, not the algorithm’s. Every methodology decision is documented and reproducible.

06Selected work

Representative matters.

Client identities withheld

Invalidity · Electronics
Challenge
Existing vendors failed to find novelty-destroying prior art on a complex pre-AIA opposition.
Approach
15+ days of manual analysis, with technical grounds argued to US patent-law standards.
Result
Found the one reference others missed.
“We believe we can challenge the patent’s novelty using the identified prior art. Good start!”
Invalidity · Mechanical
Challenge
Prior art for four distinct adjustment mechanisms in a European rolling-mill patent under a tight deadline.
Approach
Mechanism-by-mechanism search with steering interim reports.
Result
Relevant art for three mechanisms plus context for the fourth, on time.
“Phenomenal work, as always.”
Freedom-to-Operate · Medical Devices
Challenge
Prior art disclosing both cutting-teeth shape and side structure of a dental drill, where prior efforts fell short.
Approach
Exhaustive design-and-utility search, image-vs-image mapping and all-element analysis.
Result
The precise reference needed, market safeguarded.
“It seems your searchers are on the right track!”
Portfolio Analysis · 15,000+ documents
Challenge
An entire portfolio benchmarked, 100% manual, with no automation, in a fixed 30-day window.
Approach
A dedicated analyst team working by hand, weekly client calls and findings linked to real domain events.
Result
Delivered on deadline; led to two further mandates and the client’s FTO programme.
“The analytics linked to historical events made the entire dataset genuinely useful.”

Unedited client feedback. Identities withheld by segment and region.

“Regarding that search: the results were impeccable.”

Metallurgy, Corporate · Austria

“As said, I am quite happy with the new format, as it makes cross-checking and commenting quite easy.”

Medical Devices, Corporate · Germany

“Your results have been very helpful in assessing our options in the planned opposition proceedings. The documents you identified are relevant in the field.”

Medical Devices, Corporate · Germany

“The Korean document is a perfect disclosure – it makes clear this should break before the part is damaged.”

Medical Devices, Corporate · Switzerland

“That looks fantastic. The first prior-art document is a perfect hit – and the second is really good too.”

Medical Devices, Corporate · Switzerland

“The report looks good. We used the references you identified in submitting the third-party submission.”

Law Firm · US

“The Examiner has accepted the first application. Thank you for your excellent work.”

Law Firm · Israel

“Terrific work on these materials. I look forward to working together on further applications.”

Law Firm · US

“Thanks for the fast turnaround on the project.”

Medical Devices, Corporate · US
08Technical depth
01Mechanical Engineering
02Electrical & Electronics
03Medical Devices & Life Sciences
04Software & AI/ML
05Chemistry & Materials
06Patent Illustration
07India & Global Prosecution
09An extension of your team

Built around your portfolio.

For teams with recurring search needs.

Beyond individual projects, 3AIP works as an ongoing extension of in-house IP teams and firms — dedicated, credentialed analysts who learn your portfolio and core technology areas, coordinate directly with your attorneys, and work across a time-zone offset so searches progress overnight and results are ready when your day begins. For pre-filing, M&A and venture-diligence matters, confidential material is handled in controlled environments under NDA and is never exposed to third-party AI tools. Our analysts do the searching, and your material stays inside our controlled environment.

Abstract architectural ribs representing structured collaboration
10Sample reports

See the standard of the deliverable.

Request a representative sample matched to the service and technical context you are evaluating.

01Medical Devices

Patentability & Novelty Search

Prior-art ranking, novelty assessment and claim-focused analyst opinion.

Request sample
02Mechanical Systems

Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

Live-claim review, jurisdiction risk matrix and design-around observations.

Request sample
03NLP / Software

Invalidity Search

Priority-date evidence, element mapping and documented invalidity rationale.

Request sample
04Connected Products

Evidence-of-Use Claim Chart

Product evidence mapped to claim elements with traceable supporting sources.

Request sample
05Battery Technology

Patent Landscape & White Space

Portfolio segmentation, filing trends, competitor positions and open territory.

Request sample
06CMOS / Semiconductors

Licensing Claim Chart

Use-ready claim mapping for licensing review and target prioritisation.

Request sample
07Mechanical Assembly

Patent Illustration Set

A coordinated drawing set prepared around formal filing requirements.

Request sample
08Electronics

Prosecution Search

Examiner-citation review, supplemental research and prosecution support analysis.

Request sample
09Multi-Jurisdiction Prior Art

AI Output Validation

Independent assessment of client-supplied AI results: what is reliable, what is weak and what is missing.

Request sample

Confidentiality built for pre-filing, M&A and sensitive diligence matters: NDA-first, isolated data environments, full audit trail.

See our security standards
Begin a conversation

Discuss a matter.

A 20-minute scoping call with the analyst who would run your search.